
To evaluate the role of compomers in secondary caries formation in vitro.36 human teeth with caries-free enamel (coronal) and root surfaces underwent a fluoride-free prophylaxis. Class V cavities were prepared in buccal and lingual coronal and root surfaces. The teeth were divided into two groups with 3 treatment subdivisions [12 teeth per restorative material (6 with coronal restorations and 6 with root surface restorations)]). The preparations were restored with: (1) filled composite (Filtek Z250 with Single Bond), (2) fluoride-releasing compomer [Hytac with Prompt L-Pop (fluoride-releasing water-based adhesive)]; or (3) fluoride-releasing compomer [Dyract AP with Prime & Bond NT (fluoride-releasing acetone-based adhesive)]. 24 cavities (6 teeth with 2 cavities/tooth) were available with each treatment. The teeth were thermocycled (500 cycles at 5-50 degrees C) in synthetic saliva prior to artificial caries formation. After lesion formation, 5 longitudinal sections were taken from each specimen for polarized light evaluation. Mean surface lesion depths and wall lesion frequencies were determined.The Filtek Z250 group had significantly (P 0.05, ANOVA, DMR).
Photomicrography, Analysis of Variance, Compomers, Dental Caries, Composite Resins, Cariostatic Agents, Diffusion, Fluorides, Polymethacrylic Acids, Glass Ionomer Cements, Recurrence, Dentin-Bonding Agents, Image Processing, Computer-Assisted, Humans, Methacrylates, Bisphenol A-Glycidyl Methacrylate, Microscopy, Polarization, Dental Cavity Preparation, Dental Enamel, Dental Restoration, Permanent
Photomicrography, Analysis of Variance, Compomers, Dental Caries, Composite Resins, Cariostatic Agents, Diffusion, Fluorides, Polymethacrylic Acids, Glass Ionomer Cements, Recurrence, Dentin-Bonding Agents, Image Processing, Computer-Assisted, Humans, Methacrylates, Bisphenol A-Glycidyl Methacrylate, Microscopy, Polarization, Dental Cavity Preparation, Dental Enamel, Dental Restoration, Permanent
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 16 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
