Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
addClaim

[Parasternal lymph node excision in breast cancer].

Authors: A Kh, Ismagilov; E I, Sigal; A M, Gimranov;

[Parasternal lymph node excision in breast cancer].

Abstract

Comparative analysis of the results of videothoracoscopic parasternal lymphadenectomy and standard mastectomy by Urban--Holdin is presented. In November 1995 to December 1999 205 videothoracoscopic parasternal lymphadenectomies were performed (96--on the left, 104--on the right). Central and medial location of breast cancer was indication for this operation. Age of the patients ranged from 23 to 73 years. Surgery was performed under intravenous anesthesia in the conditions of artificial lung ventilation with separate lung intubation. Mastectomy was performed as the first stage. Further, thoracoports were introduced into pleural cavity in the 5th intercostal space along medioclavicular and mediaxillar lines and in the 4th intercostal space along anterior axillar line. Parietal pleurotemy was performed parallely to internal thoracic vessels, parasternal fat and lymph nodes were removed en-block. Parasternal lymph nodes were involved in 40 (19.5%) patients. The spirometry, cardiomonitoring which were used pre-, intra-, postoperatively demonstrated that parasternal thoracoscopic lymphadenectomy is less traumatic and effective as diagnostic method than mastectomy by Urban--Holdin. Parasternal thoracoscopic lymphadenectomy can be recommended as a method of choice in medial and central breast cancer.

Keywords

Adult, Thoracic Surgery, Video-Assisted, Age Factors, Breast Neoplasms, Middle Aged, Respiration, Artificial, Spirometry, Lymphatic Metastasis, Anesthesia, Intravenous, Humans, Lymph Node Excision, Female, Postoperative Period, Mastectomy, Aged, Monitoring, Physiologic

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
Related to Research communities
Cancer Research
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!