Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
addClaim

Methacholine challenge: test-shortening procedures.

Authors: D W, Cockcroft; D D, Marciniuk; T S, Hurst; D J, Cotton; K F, Laframboise; B D, McNab; R P, Skomro;

Methacholine challenge: test-shortening procedures.

Abstract

Validation of test-shortening procedures for the 2-min tidal breathing methacholine challenge method.Retrospective chart review.Tertiary-care university clinical pulmonary function laboratory.One thousand subjects aged 10 to 85 years (mean +/- SD, 44.5 +/- 16.0 years), 44.5% male, referred for methacholine challenge.Two-minute tidal breathing methacholine challenge was performed, with both physician and technician access to published test-shortening procedures.There were 315 positive test results (provocative concentration of methacholine causing a 20% fall in FEV(1) [PC(20)] or = 20% FEV(1) fall on the first inhalation, and 11 subjects had a > or = 20% FEV(1) fall after a skipped concentration. In only one case (0.1%) an FEV(1) fall > or = 40% on the first concentration was reported, compared with no cases after a skipped concentration and seven cases with a > or = 40% FEV(1) fall after a routine doubling dose step-up.The 2-min tidal breathing methacholine test in clinical practice can be safely shortened to an average of less than four inhalations using starting concentrations based on FEV(1), asthma medication, and clinical features, and by occasionally omitting concentrations.

Keywords

Adult, Male, Adolescent, Dose-Response Relationship, Drug, Middle Aged, Asthma, Bronchial Provocation Tests, Drug Administration Schedule, Predictive Value of Tests, Humans, Female, Child, Methacholine Chloride, Aged

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    4
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
4
Average
Average
Average
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!