
pmid: 11725571
handle: 11468/24479
This study retrospectively evaluates the results of the management using the callus distraction method, of 19 patients who had developed bone defects following acute trauma. Sixteen patients were males, with a mean age of 19.4 years (6-41 years). Thirteen patients developed bone defects as a result of high-velocity gunshot injuries, and six had defects caused by traffic accidents. The location of 12 fractures was the tibia, and seven were in the femur. The mean follow-up period was 23.6 (12-40) months. The mean length of the bone defect was 6.8 cm (4-16 cm), the distraction index was 13.3 days/cm (7.5-18 days/cm) and the external fixation index was 36.6 days/cm (32.5-46 days/cm). Fifteen (9%) pintract infections were observed among those who underwent circular external fixation and four (10%) in cases who underwent unilateral external fixation. There were no deep infections. Refracture was noted in one patient (5%), and two (11%) had delayed union at the target site. One patient developed nonunion at the target site. For the treatment of large bone defects, the callus distraction method may be an alternative option to conventional treatment methods.
Adult, Male, Adolescent, Bone Defects, Osteogenesis, Distraction, Callus Distraction, Bone and Bones, Radiography, Humans, Female, Child, Follow-Up Studies, Retrospective Studies
Adult, Male, Adolescent, Bone Defects, Osteogenesis, Distraction, Callus Distraction, Bone and Bones, Radiography, Humans, Female, Child, Follow-Up Studies, Retrospective Studies
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 10 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
