
The increasing use of flexible esophagoscopes leads to controversies regarding the current status of rigid hypopharyngo-esophagoscopy in case of suspected foreign body impaction.In a retrospective investigation we analyzed 309 open tube hypopharyngo-esophagoscopies performed for suspected foreign body impaction.In 108 patients (35.0 %) a foreign body was detected endoscopically. 69 Patients (22.3 %) had other pathologic findings within the upper digestive tract. 72 % of the foreign bodies and 83 % of the pathologic findings were localized within the hypopharynx or the cervical esophagus.The superior diagnostic and therapeutic properties of the classical rigid endoscopy in this area underlines its still actual status in patients with suspected foreign body impaction.
Adult, Aged, 80 and over, Male, Adolescent, Age Factors, Infant, Newborn, Infant, Oropharynx, Middle Aged, Foreign Bodies, Diagnosis, Differential, Hypopharynx, Esophagus, Child, Preschool, Humans, Female, Esophagoscopy, Child, Aged, Retrospective Studies
Adult, Aged, 80 and over, Male, Adolescent, Age Factors, Infant, Newborn, Infant, Oropharynx, Middle Aged, Foreign Bodies, Diagnosis, Differential, Hypopharynx, Esophagus, Child, Preschool, Humans, Female, Esophagoscopy, Child, Aged, Retrospective Studies
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 11 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
