Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
addClaim

"Possono le conoscenze anatomo-embriologiche giustificare la laringectomia sovraglottica?"

Authors: L. BELLUSSI; LAURIELLO, MARIA; L. PROBBO; VETUSCHI, ANTONELLA; D. PASSALI;

"Possono le conoscenze anatomo-embriologiche giustificare la laringectomia sovraglottica?"

Abstract

Gli Autori rilevano come pur essendo identificabile a livello laringeo una linea di demarcazione passante per il bordo libero superiore della glottide e definita “biological wall” ventricolare, struttura anatomica che per la sua organizzazione microscopica è in grado di resistere alla invasione carcinomatosa, non sia invece ipotizzabile l’esistenza in senso assoluto di compartimenti che per le loro caratteristiche istologiche siano in grado di ostacolare il carcinoma laringeo nella sua progressiva estensione. L’anatomia microscopica, pertanto, pur essendo in grado di fornirci indicazioni sulla sede, l’estensione e il tipo di neoplasia laringea, non è sufficiente da sola, ad indirizzare il chirurgo verso l’approccio terapeutico più appropriato dovendosi questi avvalere soprattutto della propria esperienza clinica.

Although it is possible to identify in the larinx a boundary line named “biological wall” crossed the superior margin of the glottis and which is considered an anatomical structure able to resist the tumoral invasion, the Authors think it is hard to suppose the exsistence of specific histological departments which hinder the progressive growth of a cancer of the larynx. Therefore the only microscopic anatomy, which can provide with indications concerning the seat, the extension and the kind of neoplasm, is not able to point out the most suitable therapeutical approach . So surgeon have to avail himself all of his clinical experience.

Country
Italy
Related Organizations
Keywords

Cancer of the larynx; Biological wall; Microscopic anatomy of the larynx

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
Related to Research communities
Cancer Research
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!