Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
addClaim

[Cavitations in biological tissues].

Authors: J, Jenne;

[Cavitations in biological tissues].

Abstract

An important reason for the high popularity of diagnostic ultrasound is its lack of hazardous side effects. However, as described below, the probability of inducing undesirable thermal and mechanical effects in tissue increases with a rise in the output of diagnostic ultrasound machines.The use of increasing negative peak pressures of the applied ultrasound pulse enhances the risk of inducing cavitation inside the body. The potential damage of cavitation results from the dynamic, e. g. wild pulsation, and a collapse of bubbles in the respective sound field. The collapse, especially, releases a high amount of energy, related to secondary effects like shock waves, jet formation and the formation of free radicals. To estimate the likelihood of cavitation and ensuing mechanical biological effects the so-called mechanical index was defined. Nowadays, the mechanical index is displayed in real-time on modern diagnostic ultrasound machines. Echo-contrast agents play an increasing role in sonography. These stabilised gas particles increase the likelihood of cavitation formation and the occurrence of other biological side effects. The potential for mechanically induced side effects of diagnostic ultrasound was tested in many animal studies. As for the use of ultrasound for diagnostic purposes, adverse side effects, like haemorrhage or rupture of capillaries, were only observed in the presence of tissue-gas interfaces - as found in the lung or the intestine - or with high concentrations of contrast media.Even though no adverse effects of diagnostic ultrasound have been reported in humans, potentially damaging effect of advanced ultrasound techniques cannot be denied. Various ultrasound organizations, e.g. WFUMB, have therefore formulated recommendations for the safe use of diagnostic ultrasound.

Keywords

Lung Diseases, Species Specificity, Cysts, Risk Factors, Contrast Media, Humans, Hemorrhage, Ultrasonography

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    23
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Top 10%
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
23
Average
Top 10%
Top 10%
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!