
The purpose was to explore the psychometrics and correlates of the Toronto Alexithymia Scale (TAS-20) after myocardial infarction (MI).The TAS-20 and other self-report measures were administered 3-6 months after discharge to 1443 patients.Good internal reliability was confirmed for the total TAS-20 and two subscales (F1 and F2). The F3 showed low internal consistency linked to negatively keyed items. The prevalence of alexithymia was 30.2% at the first interview. Alexithymics were older, less educated, more likely to have previous MIs and had higher scores on all measures of negative emotions. Six-month test-retest reliability was.47 (n=167). Residual change score analysis showed patients with more education and a first MI had greater decreases in alexithymia than expected.The TAS-20 has adequate internal consistency in post-MI patients, and its correlates are similar to other reports. Low temporal stability suggests that secondary alexithymia is important after MI.
Adult, Aged, 80 and over, Male, Psychiatric Status Rating Scales, Canada, Psychometrics, Myocardial Infarction, Reproducibility of Results, Confounding Factors, Epidemiologic, Middle Aged, Prevalence, Humans, Female, Affective Symptoms, Prospective Studies, Survivors, Factor Analysis, Statistical, Aged, Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic
Adult, Aged, 80 and over, Male, Psychiatric Status Rating Scales, Canada, Psychometrics, Myocardial Infarction, Reproducibility of Results, Confounding Factors, Epidemiologic, Middle Aged, Prevalence, Humans, Female, Affective Symptoms, Prospective Studies, Survivors, Factor Analysis, Statistical, Aged, Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 68 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
