
handle: 11591/186204
In this paper we report the results of two experiments, each one comprising two designs (a prisoner dilemma and a third party punishment; Fehr et al., 2004), conducted with a sample of University students and a sample of Camorra prison inmates, both coming from the same Italian region (Campania). Our research hypothesis is that there are consistent differences in cooperative and sanctioning behaviour between the two samples, though they come from very similar economic and cultural backgrounds. The presence of these differences would justify the claim that economic analyses of crime must be integrated with a behavioural perspective. The results of the experiments fully support our research hypothesis, as we find substantial differences between the two samples.
Economics of Crime, Experimental Economics, Prisoner Dilemma, Third Party Punishment,
Economics of Crime, Experimental Economics, Prisoner Dilemma, Third Party Punishment,
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
