
handle: 11588/753648 , 20.500.14243/12939 , 11386/1742538 , 11386/1660962 , 11573/509599 , 11573/509563 , 11585/526588
handle: 11588/753648 , 20.500.14243/12939 , 11386/1742538 , 11386/1660962 , 11573/509599 , 11573/509563 , 11585/526588
Venting devices are the main solution for the mitigation of accidental explosion. However, relief ducts are mandatory for the discharge of combustion products to safe location. On the other hand, the presence of a duct is likely to increase the severity of the explosion with respect to simply vented vessels. To this regard, several mechanisms have been proposed to account for the enhanced violence of the explosion in such configuration: secondary explosion in the duct (burnup), frictional drag and inertia of the gas column in the duct, acoustic and Helmholtz oscillations. The relative effects of the cited phenomena and their weight on maximum pressure reached during ducted vented explosion is uncertain. As a consequence, appropriate design of ductventing configuration is still a matter of debate and it’s not surprising that the available guidelines for the design of ducted vents for gas explosions can lead to gross errors. The authors have recently proposed experimental and numerical analyses (Computational Fluid Dynamics) for the analysis of duct-vented phenomena on the peak pressure measured in either small, medium or large scale equipment. Results of these studies highlighted that the two main phenomena responsible for the increased peak pressure are: i) the explosion occurring in the initial sections of the duct leading to a backflow from the duct towards the main vessel, thus restricting the effective vent section; ii) the turbulization of flame within the combustion chamber, due to the backflow, which enhances the combustion rate and the rate of pressure rise. In this paper, we propose an engineering correlation based on semi-empirical engineering methodologies aiming at quantifying the relation between the geometric properties (venting section, duct length, vessel volume) and the peak pressure occurring in the combustion chamber in the presence of a duct fitted on the vent panel.
Risk, Combustion chambers; Computational fluid dynamics; Design; Explosions; Vents, Accidental explosion; Combustion products; Engineering correlations; Engineering methodology; Experimental and numerical analysis; Geometric properties; Large scale equipments; Secondary explosion, Ducts, Reliability and Quality, Biotechnology; Chemical Engineering (all); Bioengineering; Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality, Chemical Engineering (all), Bioengineering, Safety, Biotechnology
Risk, Combustion chambers; Computational fluid dynamics; Design; Explosions; Vents, Accidental explosion; Combustion products; Engineering correlations; Engineering methodology; Experimental and numerical analysis; Geometric properties; Large scale equipments; Secondary explosion, Ducts, Reliability and Quality, Biotechnology; Chemical Engineering (all); Bioengineering; Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality, Chemical Engineering (all), Bioengineering, Safety, Biotechnology
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
