Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Archivio della Ricer...arrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao
versions View all 4 versions
addClaim

This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.

You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.

Fibroblast Looks Like a Mesenchymal Stem Cell and Talks Like a Mesenchymal Stem Cell: is It a Mesenchymal Stem Cell in Disguise?

Authors: Sacco A; Di Meglio F; Nurzynska D; Romano VERONICA; Belviso I; Di Gennaro M; Carfora A; +5 Authors

Fibroblast Looks Like a Mesenchymal Stem Cell and Talks Like a Mesenchymal Stem Cell: is It a Mesenchymal Stem Cell in Disguise?

Abstract

Induced Pluripotent Stem Cells (iPSCs) are adult somatic cells genetically reprogrammed to an embryonic stem cell-like state. Fibroblast (FB) is the adult somatic cell most commonly used for reprogramming and is defined by spindle-shape morphology, plastic-adherence and expression of several markers. Nonetheless, such properties also define Mesenchymal Stem Cells (MSCs), that also share with dermal FB the ability to differentiate into osteoblasts, adipocytes and chondroblasts. Moving from the hypothesis that the most striking difference between FBs and MSCs is in the name, we isolated and cultured human dermal and visceral FBs from tissue waste fragments of patients undergoing surgical procedures, and evaluated their morphology and expression of markers typical of MSCs, at gene and protein level. Additionally, we analyzed synthesis and release of specific growth factors in culture medium and, finally, we tested FB ability to differentiate into osteoblasts, adipocytes and chondroblasts. Interestingly, all FBs in culture adhered to plastic culture dishes, expressed markers typical of MSCs, like CD90, CD105, CD146,SSEA-4, ECM2, ID-1, and were morphologically undistinguishable. As reported for MSCs, FBs released EGF, FGF-4, GDNF, HGF, IGF, TGF-b and VEGF, and were capable of differentiating into cells of mesodermal origin. Our findings raise the question of whether FBs and MSCs are not admittedly the same population.We might infer that previously described differences are due to different stages of differentiation, which also account for reports on high variability in both expression of mesenchymal markers by MSCs and efficiency of FB reprogramming to iPSCs.

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    citations
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
citations
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
Related to Research communities
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!