Linguistic and legal vagueness in EU directives on immigration and asylum: the value(s) of should
Linguistic and legal vagueness in EU directives on immigration and asylum: the value(s) of should
The main aim of the study is to investigate the values of 'should'in EU discourse, specifically, in the Directives for harmonising Member States'efforts to grant refugees'and displaced persons' civil and human rights, focusing on the concept of linguistic and legal vagueness / ambiguity. The investigation is mainly grounded on studies on vagueness and ambiguity in normative texts (Pinkal 19995; Endicott 2000; 2005; Palmer 2001, Williams 2006)
vagueness; institutional discourse; immigration; modal value(s); ideological implications, modal value(s), Modality; vagueness; ambiguity, vagueness, ideological implications, institutional discourse, immigration
vagueness; institutional discourse; immigration; modal value(s); ideological implications, modal value(s), Modality; vagueness; ambiguity, vagueness, ideological implications, institutional discourse, immigration
selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources.This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).0 popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.Average influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).Average impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.Average
Citations provided by BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!