
handle: 11588/3161 , 11580/27983
Modeling activities, specifically model calibration, need sensor measurements. Since data collection is expensive and time-consuming, ineffective measurements should be avoided. For this reason, it is important to have a method for designing the field data collection that will give the most useful information. While sampling design problems were more studied in ground-water systems, there are only few applications to water distribution networks. In this paper three different sensitivity-based methods for selecting the worthwhile sensor location in water distribution network are compared. The covariance matrix method, previously applied to identify the most useful loading condition under which to take measurements, is adapted to a sampling design problem. Since this method considers the correlation between the coefficients of the sensitivity matrix of the state variables with respect to calibration parameters, it has a higher computational cost. The three methods are applied to a hypothetical roughness calibration problem. The results show that there are no marked differences between the three methods, while the difference between poor and good sampling design is significant when the number of sensors is limited. This particular result remarks the importance of using a procedure for selecting sensor location.
model calibration, sensitivity matrix, sensor location, water distribution networks, sampling design, model calibration; roughness; sampling design; sensitivity matrix; sensor location; water distribution networks, roughness
model calibration, sensitivity matrix, sensor location, water distribution networks, sampling design, model calibration; roughness; sampling design; sensitivity matrix; sensor location; water distribution networks, roughness
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
