
handle: 11585/907641
In the past, documenting archaeological research was based mainly on subjective experience due to the lack of digital platforms that would standardise documenting a context. Although it is in the last two decades that practise has been digitally standardardised. Some user-friendly systems help collect and organise data. Sometimes, the seem non-interoperable. Then it is to study a uniwue method capable of making different software comminicate with each other. The aim of this study is the integration of state-of-the-art software to aid in developing a criterion for the creation of an archaeological data interchange protocol. FLOSS was chosen as it offers the highest level of interoperability. One premise, it is assumed that you already have pyArchInit 2.6.2 on your computer, a server with Bradypus 4.0 installend and a postgreSQL database.
Archaeology, GIS, FOSS archaeological documentation, archaeological protocol documentation, QField, pyArchInit, BraDypUS
Archaeology, GIS, FOSS archaeological documentation, archaeological protocol documentation, QField, pyArchInit, BraDypUS
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
