Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Archivio istituziona...arrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao
addClaim

Gas stunning and quality characteristics of broiler chicken breast meat

Authors: BIANCHI, MAURIZIO; PETRACCI, MASSIMILIANO; CAVANI, CLAUDIO;

Gas stunning and quality characteristics of broiler chicken breast meat

Abstract

During poultry processing, gas stunning systems are based on the birds exposure to gases which may induce either anesthesia or anoxia. Research comparing electrical and gas stunning have reported differences in incidence of carcass defects and variation in meat quality traits. However, contradictory results have been reported, especially when different stunning conditions were compared. Three trials were conducted to evaluate breast meat quality of broiler chickens (2.5 kg live wt.) processed using electrical (E) (constant voltage of 120V pulsating DC, 200 Hz, 4.6 s; 60 mA/bird) or gas (G) stunning with carbon dioxide exposure (5.5 min). Birds that were gas stunned remained in crates that were passed through underground chamber with gas concentrations increasing from 10 to 32% (Linco® system). After slaughter and chilling, the incidence of carcasses with blood-engorged wing veins and/or blood spots on breast meat was evaluated (n = 144/stunning system). Breast (P. major) muscles were deboned immediately after air chilling (commercial deboning time, 2.5 h) or after 6 and 24 h postmortem (n = 36/deboning time/stunning system; n = 216). The meat pH was determined immediately after deboning, whereas color (L*a*b*), cook yield, and AK-shear of cooked meat were determined after 24 h postmortem. In comparison with electrical stunning, gas stunning produced a noticeably lower incidence of carcasses with blood-engorged wing veins and/or blood spots on breast meat (18.7 vs. 61.8%; P < 0.01). The stunning system did not influence breast meat postmortem pH fall, color, and cook yield. Gas stunning resulted in a lower AK-shear values when fillets were deboned after 2.5 h of aging (4.86 vs. 6.89 kg/g; P < 0.01); however, shear values were similar for both treatments when fillets were aged for 6 or 24 h postmortem. Using the conditions adopted in the present study, the major advantages of gas stunning over electrical stunning are the lower incidence of breast meat defects and lower AK-shear values of cooked meat for fillets deboned immediately after chilling .

Country
Italy
Keywords

BROILER CHICKEN; GAS STUNNING; BREAST MEAT QUALITY

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!