Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Archivio istituziona...arrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao
addClaim

Costantino e Licinio theophileis e il problema delle edizioni della Historia ecclesiastica di Eusebio di Cesarea

Authors: NERI, VALERIO LIETO SALVATORE;

Costantino e Licinio theophileis e il problema delle edizioni della Historia ecclesiastica di Eusebio di Cesarea

Abstract

the work, starting from the praise to theophileis emperors Constantine and Licinius as contained in the speech for the inauguration of the basilica of Tyre in the book X of the Ecclesiastical History of Eusebius of Caesarea, and from the titles of the chapters of the book IX, which can be attributed to Eusebius himself, aims to suggest that the narrative of the book IX was originally marked by a substantial balance between the two emperors. The obvious imbalances in the text that we possess in favor of Constantine can be attributed to the edition of the work after the final victory of Constantine over Licinius, bearing in mind that Eusebius was a bishop in the pars of Licinius and that he himself does not attest any conflict with the 'emperor

Country
Italy
Keywords

COSTANTINO; EUSEBIO DI CESAREA; HISTORIA ECCLESIASTICA

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!