
handle: 11585/133974
tHE NOTION OF SOCIAL SUBJECT IS TAKEN UP IN THIS ESSAY AS DISTINCT FROM THAT OF THE PLURAL AGENT ADVANCED BY ANALITICAL PHILOSOPHERS. tHE AIM IS TO ELABORATE A DEFINITION AND A TENTATIVE THEORETICAL OUTLINE OF THE SOCIAL SUBJECT. sOCIAL SUBJECTSD ARE DEFINED AS A SUI GENERIS KIND OF SOCIAL RELATIONSHIP CHARACTERIZED AS A WE AND ENDOWED WITH A REFLEXIVITY OF ITS OWN.iN DIALOGUE WITH THE WORK OF SEARLE, ARCHER, VANDEMBERGHE, GILBERT, TOUMELA AND BAKER, PRANDINI INTRODUCES THE CONCEPTS OF THE RELATION OF CONSTITUTION, THE WE-MODE OF MEMBERSHIP, COMMUNITAS PERSONARUM, AND THE WE-CONCERN.
WE RELATIONSHIP; AGENCY; SOCIAL SUBJECTIVITIES; REFLEXIVITY; SOCIAL SYSTEM
WE RELATIONSHIP; AGENCY; SOCIAL SUBJECTIVITIES; REFLEXIVITY; SOCIAL SYSTEM
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
