
handle: 11585/132091
Recent multiple testing (see also Multiple comparisons) applications have benefited from the introduction of methodologies based on the false discovery rate (FDR), which has been defined in a seminal paper [1] as the expected value of the ratio of wrongly rejected null hypotheses (false discoveries) over the total rejected null hypotheses (discoveries). Procedures based on the FDR have been increasing in popularity since they offer a more powerful approach than traditional multiple comparison methods [2] in many applications, especially when the number of tests is very high.
multiple testing
multiple testing
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
