Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Archivio istituziona...arrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao
addClaim

Cell Sorting with FFF

Authors: Guégen, C.; Baalousha, M.; Williams, K.; Begaud, G.; Battu, S.; Cardot, P.; Roda, B.; +2 Authors

Cell Sorting with FFF

Abstract

In this chapter, we aim to develop, from a practical point of view, the interest of sedimentation field-flow fractionation (SdFFF), a subtechnique of the field-flow fractionation (FFF) family, exploiting external sedimentation fields to achieve label-free, biophysical cell sorting. Depending on the nature of the field, gravitational FFF (GrFFF) utilizes Earth’s gravity, while SdFFF applies a centrifugal multigravitational field. Since the pioneering work during the 1980s, SdFFF has emerged as a promising tool for biological separations. Despite an initially slow adoption, subsequent decades have seen a growing body of research applying GrFFF and SdFFF to a wide range of cell types, including red blood cells, stem cells, cancer stem cells, and various mammalian cells, in disciplines such as microbiology, virology, oncology, and neurology. Recently, for adherent cells the nonequilibrium gravity-assisted dynamic fractionation (Earth gravity-assisted dynamic fractionation, NEEGA-DF) was also developed. From early applications to cortical neurons to more recent advances involving induced pluripotent stem cells and mesenchymal stem cells, these techniques have demonstrated high performance in isolating rare or specific cell subpopulations from complex biological matrices. The unique advantage of FFF methods lies in their ability to separate cells based on intrinsic physical characteristics—such as size, density, rigidity, and shape—without the need for markers or labels and with total maintenance of native cell properties including cell morphology and viability. These features make them valuable tools for cell biology, diagnostics, and therapeutic applications. While fluorescence- and magnetic-assisted sorting remain gold standards, sedimentation-based FFF techniques constitute powerful alternatives, offering sterile, functional, and reusable cell populations for biotechnological and clinical uses. Thus, GrFFF and SdFFF may be considered essential, though underutilized, methodologies in the expanding field of bioseparation sciences.

Country
Italy
Keywords

Gravitational FFF / Sedimentation FFF / Hyperlayer elution mode

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
Related to Research communities
Cancer Research
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!