Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ Archivio istituziona...arrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

Camel welfare: survey on camel caretakers' perspectives

Authors: Menchetti Laura; Monaco Davide; Abdelai Ziani; Padalino Barbara;

Camel welfare: survey on camel caretakers' perspectives

Abstract

Animal welfare depends on caretakers’ handling and management skills. The study aimed at gaining information on camel caretakers’ backgrounds, their perceptions of welfare and management practices and at investigating associations with camel health and behavioural problems. The study was conducted at a camel market in Qatar and 49 caretakers were interviewed (29 questions). Caretakers were male, mainly from Sudan (91.7%; P<0.001), and had mainly learned camel management from family members (81.6%; P<0.001). Camels were mainly from Qatar, reared for milk, breeding or meat. The majority of the caretakers under 30 years took care of camels reared as breeding animals or for milk production (n=12, 75.0%), while the caretakers over 40 years took care of camels for dual-purposes (n=7, 46.7%; P<0.05) or meat (n=4, 26.7%). Camels received rationed feed and water (87.6%, 53.1%, P<0.001), and were dewormed regularly (96.8%, P<0.001) but not vaccinated (72.9%; P<0.001). Respondents experienced at least one camel with a behavioural (45.8%) and a health (87.8%) problem and associations between management practices and those problems were found. Behavioural problems were associated with the number of health problems, suggesting that sick camels tended to show behavioural modifications. Caretakers ranked their ability to recognise a camel in distress/pain as high, reporting that the first sign was a change in behaviour. The caretakers’ understanding of animal welfare was, however, low, missing the overall meaning of the concept; most caretakers defined animal welfare according to only one (52.2%) welfare principle. Overall, early and appropriate treatment of camels with health and behavioural problems, an increased presence of veterinarians at camel farms, and education on camel behaviour and welfare are recommended.

Animal welfare depends on caretakers' handling and management skills. The study aimed at gaining information on camel caretakers' backgrounds, their perceptions of welfare and management practices and at investigating associations with camel health and behavioural problems. The study was conducted at a camel market in Qatar and 49 caretakers were interviewed (29 questions). Caretakers were male, mainly from Sudan (91.7%; P<0.001), and had mainly learned camel management from family members (81.6%; P<0.001). Camels were mainly from Qatar, reared for milk, breeding or meat. The majority of the caretakers under 30 years took care of camels reared as breeding animals or for milk production (n=12, 75.0%), while the caretakers over 40 years took care of camels for dual-purposes (n=7, 46.7%; P<0.05) or meat (n=4, 26.7%). Camels received rationed feed and water (87.6%, 53.1%, P<0.001), and were dewormed regularly (96.8%, P<0.001) but not vaccinated (72.9%; P<0.001). Respondents experienced at least one camel with a behavioural (45.8%) and a health (87.8%) problem and associations between management practices and those problems were found. Behavioural problems were associated with the number of health problems, suggesting that sick camels tended to show behavioural modifications. Caretakers ranked their ability to recognise a camel in distress/pain as high, reporting that the first sign was a change in behaviour. The caretakers' understanding of animal welfare was, however, low, missing the overall meaning of the concept; most caretakers defined animal welfare according to only one (52.2%) welfare principle. Overall, early and appropriate treatment of camels with health and behavioural problems, an increased presence of veterinarians at camel farms, and education on camel behaviour and welfare are recommended.

Country
Italy
Keywords

behaviour; dromedary camel; health; management; welfare

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
Green