
handle: 11580/73839
The deliberation in the following paper has the intentional meaning of sparkling or raising a doubt about the sustainability of the phenomenon known as empathy (from a cognitive point of view), highlighting the primary question in relation to its nature. The main focus will be centered (hopefully!) towards an approach that will take into account thoughts about the issue and the moral responsibility, because there is a belief that understanding the phenomenon cannot be excluded from the issue of freedom1. This belief, though, will be object, in another context, of further analysis, because, at this moment, it is primarily important to reflect either of the nature of free will and the cognitive empathy.
free will, responsibility, empathy, emotionalism, will
free will, responsibility, empathy, emotionalism, will
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
