
handle: 11577/3510771 , 11568/1208147 , 11585/942501
We introduce a variation on Barthe et al.’s higher-order logic in which formulas are interpreted as predicates over open rather than closed objects. This way, concepts which have an intrinsically functional nature, like continuity, differentiability, or monotonicity, can be expressed and reasoned about in a very natural way, following the structure of the underlying program. We give open higher-order logic in distinct flavors, and in particular in its relational and local versions, the latter being tailored for situations in which properties hold only in part of the underlying function’s domain of definition.
Formal Verification, Relational Logic, First-Order Properties, First-Order Properties; Formal Verification; Relational Logic, First-Order Properties, [INFO] Computer Science [cs], Relational Logic, Formal Verification, 004
Formal Verification, Relational Logic, First-Order Properties, First-Order Properties; Formal Verification; Relational Logic, First-Order Properties, [INFO] Computer Science [cs], Relational Logic, Formal Verification, 004
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
