Downloads provided by UsageCounts
handle: 11577/3508134 , 11380/1331156
Purpose: This paper aims to analyze if family firms have been more resilient than non-family firms during the first phase of the COVID-19 pandemic, focusing on the coping step of organizational resilience. Methodology: Secondary data from the database Aida are used for this purpose. The sample includes 16420 firms (i.e., 13893 family firms and 2527 non-family firms) located in Northeastern regions of Italy. T-tests are carried out to identify the main differences. Findings: Results confirm the negative impact of COVID-19 on firms. However, family firms demonstrated a higher capacity to cope with the pandemic, reporting a lower loss in revenues compared to non-family firms. Managerial implications: Our findings underline the importance of resilience in businesses, providing entrepreneurs with valuable insights to strengthen their organizations and prepare them for future challenges. Research limitations: Our study has limitations, suggesting potential areas for future research. A quantitative analysis alone cannot fully elucidate the resilience of family firms; a qualitative study could complement and address this gap. Originality: This paper analyzes firms' performance in the middle of the crisis. Previous studies analyzed the post-crisis survival of firms or compared firms’ characteristics before and after the crisis to understand if changes occurred.
family firms, non-family firms, COVID-19, performance, resilience;
family firms, non-family firms, COVID-19, performance, resilience;
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
| views | 17 | |
| downloads | 1 |

Views provided by UsageCounts
Downloads provided by UsageCounts