
handle: 11577/3013926
There is considerable evidence linking the N2pc event-related lateralized response with processing of lateral visual targets, usually presented in the presence of visual distractors. It has proven challenging determine to what extent the N2pc reflects mechanisms of target selection versus possible mechanisms of distractor suppression. We present new evidence that is difficult to reconcile both with the distractor-suppression account of the N2pc (which predicts an increase in the amplitude of N2pc in the presence of distractors) and with the finding that N2pc is modulated by the distance between competing stimuli (N2pc is reduced as distance is reduced). In this talk we present new evidence suggesting a mechanism operating on a local spatial scale that can filter out salient distractors, leading to a reduced N2pc, but only under some conditions. The results are discussed in the context of extant models of attention mechanisms leading to the N2pc component.
ATTENTION
ATTENTION
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
