Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Padua research Archi...arrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

Total lymphocytes count predicts pancreatic cancer survival

Authors: GALLO N; FOGAR, PAOLA; FALDA A; NAVAGLIA F; ZAMBON, CARLO-FEDERICO; GRECO, ELIANA; SANZARI MC; +3 Authors

Total lymphocytes count predicts pancreatic cancer survival

Abstract

Background: An impaired host immuninity might concur in determining the tremendous prognosis of pancreatic cancer (PC). Our aim was to ascertain whether the pattern of blood lymphocytes immunophenotype in PC correlates with: (1) tumor stage, (2) tumor grade, (3) the development of metastases after surgery, (4) survival. Patients and Methods: We studied 46 PC patients. Staging was: stage I 2.2%, stage II 8.9%, stage III 48.9%, stage IV 40.0%. Grading was: G1 19.4%, G2 47.2%, G3 33.3%. Survival was available for 32 patients (minimum 1, maximum 24, median 19 months). Metastases were found after surgery in 76% of these patients. Lymphocyte immunophenotype was determined by FACS analysis. The following were considered: CD16/CD56 (natural killer), CD19 (B lymphocytes), CD3 (T lymphocytes), CD4 (T helper), CD8 (T cytotoxic). Results: Tumor stage did not correlate with lymphocytes immunophenotype or total lymphocyte count. CD16/56 were lower in patients with (14.7% 1.14, mean SE) than in those without lymphnode metastases (25.4% 4.9) (t 9.83, p 0.01). CD4 were lower in patients with undifferentiated (47.6% 2.1) than in those with well differentiated PC (55.6% 2.1) (t 2.65, p 0.05). Tumor stage, not grade (2 3.55, p:ns), correlated with the development of metastases after surgery (2 12.75, p 0.01). Patients who developed distant metastases after surgery had also significantly lower levels of total lymphocytes (Mann Whitney U 31.5, p 0.05). Total lymphocyte count discriminated patients who developed from patients who did not develop distant metastases after surgery with a sensitivity of 75% and a specificity of 64% (cutoff 1.5 109/L). The overall survival of patients correlated with tumor stage (Log rank 12.4, p 0.01), but also with total lymphocytes (Log rank 16.5, p 0.001). The association between survival and total lymphocyte count was confirmed when stage III (Log rank 10.2, p 0.005) or stage IV patients (Log rank 3.0, p 0.08) were considered singly. Conclusions: The presence of lymphnode metastases at diagnosis or the development of metastases after surgery are significantly associated with a reduction of natural killer cells and total lymphocytes counts. A reduction in the latter at diagnosis could predict patients’ survival, indendently from tumor stage.

Country
Italy
Related Organizations
  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!