
handle: 11577/2494901 , 2158/778604
The α decay of Ru compound nuclei populated in 32S on 58,60,62,64Ni reactions at Ebeam=135–185 MeV has been studied. Experimental data have been compared with statistical model calculations performed with two different computer codes. The quality of the agreement between calculations and experimental data was found, in one case, to depend on the compound nucleus populated. Comparing the results from the two computer codes, deviations in the predicted cross sections are evidenced which are due to the different parametrization of nuclear properties employed in the calculations. Statistical model calculations describe well the shape of experimental spectra if account is taken of changes in the phase space available to the decaying nucleus which are related to the onset of deformations at high spins. Fission competition strongly determines the alpha-particle cross sections at the higher bombarding energies which are systematically underestimated by the model calculations if transmission coefficients computed from optical model potentials are used.
statistical model; compound nuclei, Experimental methods and instrumentation for elementary-particle and nuclear physics
statistical model; compound nuclei, Experimental methods and instrumentation for elementary-particle and nuclear physics
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
