
handle: 11576/2509574 , 11573/595980
This paper examines the reaction of the Chinese Government to the Michelangelo Antonioni’s documentary film, Chung-kuo, shot in 1973. The fil was banned and Antonioni became the target of a criticism campaign, launched by the pages of People’s Daily. Were these har attacks indications of internal conflicts in the CCP or were they violent –indirect – criticism to the “revisionist and socialimperialist” policy adopted by the Italian Communist Party as judged by the CCP?
L'articolo prende in esame la reazione che il governo cinese manifestò, nel gennaio del 1974, nei confronti del documentario Chung-kuo, girato da Michelangelo Antonioni in Cina, pochi mesi prima. I duri attacchi lanciati dal governo cinese, dalle pagine del Quotidiano del popolo, furono espressione di una lotta interna al Pcc o critiche violente alla politica "revisionista e socialimperialista" che il PCI conduceva in quegli anni a detta dei compagni cinesi?
Antonioni; Chungkuo; Cina, CIna; Antonioni; critica; documentario
Antonioni; Chungkuo; Cina, CIna; Antonioni; critica; documentario
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
