
pmid: 7517582
handle: 11573/382537
In Italy plant extracts represent 8.6% of all pharmacological prescriptions for Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia (data from 1991). This review evaluates all the suggested mechanisms of action for plant extracts. Recently we demonstrated an antiestrogenic effect of Serenoa Repens in BPH patients. Clinical trials with plant extracts have yielded conflicting results. In a recent review by Dreikorn and Richter, only five placebo controlled studies were found. Moreover, as opposed to chemically defined drugs, it is possible that for these extracts the active ingredients are not known; consequently pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic data are often missing. The International Consultation of Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia (Paris, June 1991) concluded that, to date, phytotherapeutic agents must be considered as a symptomatic treatment. Now more adequate pharmacological and clinical studies, placebo controlled, should determine the exact role of these drugs in the treatment of BPH.
Male, Clinical Trials as Topic, Plant Extracts, Palliative Care, Prostatic Hyperplasia, Androgen Antagonists, Sitosterols, Rats, 5-alpha Reductase Inhibitors, Double-Blind Method, Italy, Receptors, Estrogen, Serenoa, Androgen Receptor Antagonists, Prostaglandins, Animals, Humans, Pollen, benign prostatic hypertrophy; plant extracts, Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic
Male, Clinical Trials as Topic, Plant Extracts, Palliative Care, Prostatic Hyperplasia, Androgen Antagonists, Sitosterols, Rats, 5-alpha Reductase Inhibitors, Double-Blind Method, Italy, Receptors, Estrogen, Serenoa, Androgen Receptor Antagonists, Prostaglandins, Animals, Humans, Pollen, benign prostatic hypertrophy; plant extracts, Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 28 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
