
handle: 11573/1759225
The interview retraces the central role of anomalous cases in Carlo Ginzburg’s works, starting from his earliest investigations into witchcraft trials and the inquisitorial transcripts concerning the benandanti and the miller Menocchio. It also reflects on the relationship between microhistory and case studies, as well as the role of chance in historical research. It finally focuses on Carlo Ginzburg’s recent interest in casuistry as an historical phenomenon and his book Nondimanco (2018), devoted to Machiavelli and Pascal, along with the volume he edited, Historical Approach to Casuistry (2020), which focuses on casuistry as a cognitive tool for analyzing the relationship between exceptions and norms across various fields, from theology to law.
Carlo Ginzburg, casuistry, norms and anomalies, microhistory, case studies, chance
Carlo Ginzburg, casuistry, norms and anomalies, microhistory, case studies, chance
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
