
handle: 11573/1758216
The modeling and forecasting of financial market volatility constitute fundamental components of effective risk management and optimal asset allocation. Traditional models like GARCH and SV often fail to capture the long memory and roughness empirically observed in volatility, prompting the adoption of fractional processes. Accurate esti-mation of the log-volatility roughness parameter is thus key to validating rough volatility models, with several methodologies proposed, includ-ing spectral, wavelet, and machine learning techniques. In contrast to approaches focused on moment behavior, we adopt a novel method based on the selfsimilarity of fractional processes, examining how the entire log-volatility distribution scales across time horizons. We deduce the variance of the estimator and study the roughness of both CBOE VIX and realized volatility.
VIX; Realized volatility; Hurst exponent; Kolmogorov-Smirnov test
VIX; Realized volatility; Hurst exponent; Kolmogorov-Smirnov test
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
