
handle: 11572/91309
The essay presents a brief historical and conceptual overview of what is, and when we can speak of, “political pneumatology”, a concept that is rooted in the dialectical processes of secularization of the theology of history, and which is best exemplified in the opposition between universalism and particularism , or between Spirit and Letter. Whether one conceives of the dynamism of history (following the cyclic model of the Greeks), or whether one prefers to understand it as a movement with a “terminus a quo” and a “terminus ad quem” (according to the creationist and eschatological model of the Christian theology of history), the concept of “political pneumatology” seems appropriate—based on authors such as Gioacchino da Fiore, Leibniz, Fichte, Hegel, Troeltsch, Taubes, and Voegelin, among others—to prefigure the utopia of a reconciled community of men, which translates into political terms the ancient theological concept of “ecclesia invisibilis”.
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
