Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao IRIS - Università de...arrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

Correlation between gingival biotype, width of keratinized gingiva and different dental malocclusios: a clinical study

Authors: Matarese M; Matarese G.; Perillo L .; Grassia V; . Gaetano Isola;

Correlation between gingival biotype, width of keratinized gingiva and different dental malocclusios: a clinical study

Abstract

AIM: Gingival biotype is considered as an important factor in the success of periodontal and orthodontic treatment. The aim of this study was to assess the prevalence of the gingival biotype, the width of keratinized gingiva in a group of patients with different types of Angle’s classification of malocclusion. MATERIALS AND METHOD: A total of 82 periodontally healthy volunteer patients (44 females and 38 males, mean 13.9 years old) were enrolled in the study. Gingival biotype was assessed by the evaluation on the translucence of a periodontal probe through the gingival margin of the tooth during the probing at the midfacial aspect of both maxillary central, lateral incisors and canine. Moreover, on each patient, Angle’s classification of malocclusion was also recorded. In order to assess the association between gender, gingival biotype and Angle’s classification of malocclusion (categorical variables) Chi-square test was used. For continuous variables, Student’s t-test was performed in order to gender and the gingival biotype (thin or thick type). RESULTS: The prevalence in the whole sample of thin gingival biotype was 44.8%, and thick gingival biotype was 55.2%. The frequency of female gender with thin gingival biotype was significantly less respect to male patients (41.9% and 58.1%, respectively) while the frequency of thick gingival biotype was higher in the female respect to male patients (56.4% and 43.6%, respectively) (χ2=1.329, p=0.237). In the whole sample, the Angle’s classification was a class I malocclusion= 42.8%, class II= 29.4%, and class III= 27.8%. There was no significant difference in the distribution of malocclusion between genders (χ2=1.725; p=0.445). There was not a significant association between type of malocclusion and gingival biotype (p=0.143). However, there was a prevalence of thick gingival biotype in a patient with class II malocclusion and a slight prevalence of thin gingival biotype in a patient with class I malocclusion. CONCLUSIONS: The present study showed that even if was a prevalence of thin gingival biotype in female patients and a thick gingival biotype in a patient with class II malocclusion, no relationship was found between gingival biotypes and dental malocclusion in the whole analyzed the sample.

Country
Italy
  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
Green
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!