
handle: 11570/3070876
It’s been now over than 30 years since Piero Aimo wrote his book (Bicameralismo e regioni,1977) and in light of the stimuli given by the current debate on the Senate Reformation, which in Italy should be like a Chamber of autonomy, this contribution is aimed to re- examine and piece the institutional and political facts that have brought in 1946-47 the Italian republic forefathers to chose the bi- cameral structure of the Parliament, in search for the perfect two- chamber system. An unknown model to the concurrent constitution- al jurisdiction, at that time, based not only on the equal recognition of the two chambers of the Parliament, having the same popular le- gitimization and equal legislative power in the inspection and control procedures and also in trustee procedures, but also on the system of trust as set by the article 94 of Italian Constitution.
Bicameralism, Italian constitutional reform, Constituent Assembly debate
Bicameralism, Italian constitutional reform, Constituent Assembly debate
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
