
handle: 11567/854419
1 Introduction 2 Ship structures 2.1 Environment-induced vibrations 2.1.1 Wave-induced vibration 2.1.2 Ice-induced vibration 2.2 Machinery or propeller-induced vibrations 2.2.1 Propeller-induced vibration 2.2.2 Machinery-induced vibration 2.2.3 Numerical and analytical vibration studies of ship structures 2.3 Noise 2.3.1 Interior noise 2.3.2 Air radiated noise 2.3.3 Underwater radiated noise 2.4 Sloshing impact 2.4.1 Experimental approaches 2.4.2 Numerical modelling Committee II.2 Dynamic response D.S. Cho, Korea (Chair) S. Brizzolara, USA I. Chirica, Romania A. Düster, Germany A. Ergin, Turkey O.A. Hermundstad, Norway M. Holtmann, Germany C. Hung, China (Taiwan) A. Ivaldi, Italy C. Ji, China W.H. Joo, Korea B. Leira, Norway S. Malenica, France Y. Ogawa, Japan M.A. Vaz, Brazil A. Vredeveldt, Netherlands Y. Xiong, UK D. Zhan, Canada COMMITTEE MANDATE: Concern for the dynamic structural response of ship and floating offshore structures as required for safety and serviceability assessments, including habitability. This should include steady state, transient and random responses. Attention shall be given to dynamic responses resulting from environmental, machinery and propeller excitation. Uncertainties associated with modelling should be highlighted. 2.4.3 CCS structural response 2.4.4 Current approaches for sloshing assessment 2.5 Air blast and underwater explosion 2.5.1 Air blast 2.5.2 Underwater explosion 2.6 Damping and countermeasures 2.7 Monitoring 2.7.1 Hull structural monitoring system 2.7.2 New sensors technology and application 2.7.3 New full scale monitoring campaigns and related studies 2.8 Uncertainties 2.9 Standards and acceptance criteria 2.9.1 Habitability 2.9.2 Underwater noise 2.9.3 Others 3. Offshore structures 3.1 Vibration 3.1.1 Wind-induced vibration 3.1.2 Wave-induced vibration 3.1.3 Vortex-induced motion 3.1.4 Internal flow-induced vibration 3.1.5 Ice-induced vibration 3.2 Very large floating structures 3.3 Noise 3.3.1 Analysis of underwater noise by pile-driving 3.3.2 Measurement and mitigation of underwater noise 3.3.3 Equipment noise 3.4 Blast 3.5 Damping and countermeasures 3.6 Uncertainties 3.7 Standards and acceptance criteria 4 Conclusion 5 References
Acceptance criteria; Assessment; Blast; Countermeasures; Current; Damping; Dynamic response; Excitation; Fatigue damage; Full-scale measurement; Hydroelastic response; Ice; Internal flow; Machinery; Model test; Monitoring; Natural frequency; Noise; Numerical model; Propeller; Resonance; Slamming; Sloshing impact; Springing; Uncertainty; Underwater explosion; Underwater noise; Vibration; Vortex; Wave; Whipping; Wind; Management of Technology and Innovation
Acceptance criteria; Assessment; Blast; Countermeasures; Current; Damping; Dynamic response; Excitation; Fatigue damage; Full-scale measurement; Hydroelastic response; Ice; Internal flow; Machinery; Model test; Monitoring; Natural frequency; Noise; Numerical model; Propeller; Resonance; Slamming; Sloshing impact; Springing; Uncertainty; Underwater explosion; Underwater noise; Vibration; Vortex; Wave; Whipping; Wind; Management of Technology and Innovation
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
