
handle: 11565/52346
Pension reform, while urgent, proves politically very difficult. Continuing a recent line of research, this paper sheds light on the nature of these difficulties by analyzing the citizens' opinions on different aspects of pension reform. We report on the results of two surveys conducted in Germany and Italy in Spring 2000 and Fall 2001. The surveys show that the status quo is a majoritarian outcome along many dimensions: most pension reform proposals lack a majority and reformers rarely support more than one reform option. Later retirement is the easier reform in Italy (where effective retirement age is lower), while lower pensions are more popular in Germany where the effective replacement rate is higher. Preferences over policy options seem to reflect both economic self-interest and one’s normative view about the role of the state. But there is light: opposition to reform is much lower among the informed.
reforms; pension systems; Germany and Italy
reforms; pension systems; Germany and Italy
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
