Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ IRIS - Università de...arrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
addClaim

Consonant clusters and sonority in the Germanic and Romance varieties of Northern Italy

Authors: Meneguzzo, Marta;

Consonant clusters and sonority in the Germanic and Romance varieties of Northern Italy

Abstract

This survey aims at describing and analysing onsets and codas – with special focus on consonant clusters – of selected Germanic and Romance varieties spoken in the language contact area of Trentino-Alto Adige/Südtirol. We will try to determine a) what dialects can reveal about syllable theory and the universality of the sonority scale and b) whether varieties which are in contact influence one another so as to allow for similar clusters. The corresponding standard varieties (Standard German and Standard Italian) will be taken as a reference in order to identify which similarities and, more importantly, which differences the dialects under investigation exhibit with respect to them. The collected data will reveal that, generally, the examined Germanic and Romance dialects conform to the sonority scale proposed for Standard German and Standard Italian, respectively – the only exception being found in the case of Tyrolean. It will also emerge that the investigated Germanic and Romance dialects behave differently with respect to the grammar of consonant clusters. Dialects turn out to be generally more permissive than their correspondent standard varieties since they allow for lower thresholds under which their clusters are considered as illicit in sonority-related terms. Furthermore, differences will be identified within the various Germanic and Romance dialects. Indeed, it will be shown that, on the one hand, the same grammar is shared by some varieties of the Germanic group and by some varieties of the Romance group. On the other hand, other varieties will prove to be more stringent and will display their own grammar.

Country
Italy
Related Organizations
Keywords

consonant clusters, sonority, Germanic varieties, Romance varieties

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
Green