
handle: 11562/972851
Empirical evidence supports the hypothesis of a reciprocal influence between well-being (WB) and volunteering. However, these results are not conclusive in terms of whether volunteers feel better as a result of volunteering or whether those who feel good are more likely to engage in volunteering. This study aims to investigate: 1) whether and to what extent volunteers perceive that their satisfaction with life (SWL), measured by means of the Satisfaction With Life Scale, and WB (according to the Questionnaire for Eudaimonic Well-Being) have changed as a result of their involvement in voluntary service; 2) whether satisfaction with volunteering is associated with high levels of WB and SWL. I also assessed autonomous and controlled motivation (according to the Volunteer Motivation Scale) and the individual’s degree of engagement in voluntary service (adapted version of the UWES-9). The 187 Italian volunteers who participated in the study perceived that their WB and SWL improved after beginning voluntary work. Their levels of eudaimonic WB and SWL were compared to those of the general population (N=1205) and the results showed that the volunteers have significantly higher values, even though no differences emerged relating to length of service. However, the regression analyses carried out showed that the degree of engagement in voluntary activities account for 33% of the variance in eudemonic WB and that the degree of engagement is linked to the type of motivation (i.e. identified motivation). SWL seems to be only peripherally affected by motivation and satisfaction with voluntary work.
Volunteering, eudaimonic well-being, satisfaction with life, autonomous motivation
Volunteering, eudaimonic well-being, satisfaction with life, autonomous motivation
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
