Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Recolector de Cienci...arrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao
versions View all 1 versions
addClaim

"Sustainability and Interreligious Dialogue"

Authors: Tatay Nieto, Jaime; Devitt, Catherine;

"Sustainability and Interreligious Dialogue"

Abstract

Tras la promulgación de Laudato si' (LS), la histórica encíclica del Papa Francisco de 2015 sobre nuestra relación con el mundo natural, ha habido un renovado interés en el papel que las religiones y las organizaciones de inspiración religiosa pueden desempeñar en el fomento de la sostenibilidad, así como en las posibilidades y límites del diálogo interreligioso relacionado con uno de los objetivos centrales de nuestro tiempo: la consecución de los Objetivos de Desarrollo Sostenible (ODS) definidos en la Agenda 2030 de las Naciones Unidas y el Acuerdo de París sobre el Clima. Este artículo afirma que una creciente convergencia discursiva interreligiosa sobre ecología tiene sus raíces en el reconocimiento de un conjunto de metaproblemas ecológicos, más que en una meta-narrativa común y única. El surgimiento de discursos distintivos interdenominacionales e interreligiosos está configurando cada vez más una narrativa compartida y pluralista basada en la justicia social, el cuidado de la creación y la solidaridad intergeneracional. Además, las religiones y las organizaciones de inspiración religiosa ya están aportando una perspectiva integral y holística al debate socioambiental, ocupando un lugar intersticial en el ámbito de la sostenibilidad, al tiempo que desempeñan cuatro funciones clave: tender puentes, vincular, profundizar y sostener. Sin embargo, el impacto a medio y largo plazo de la reciente convergencia discursiva interreligiosa en la catálisis de la acción y el cambio de comportamiento en cuestiones ecológicas todavía carece de un análisis sólido y basado en la evidencia.

In the wake of the promulgation of Laudato si (LS), Pope Francis 2015 landmark encyclical on our relationship with the natural world, there has been a renewed interest in the role religions and Faith-Based Organizations (FBOs) can play in fostering sustainability, as well as in the possibilities and limits of interreligious dialogue related to one of the central objectives of our time: the achievement of the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) defined in the UN Agenda 2030 and the Paris Climate Accord. This article claims that a growing interreligious discursive convergence on ecology has its roots in the acknowledgment of a set of ecological meta-problems, rather than in a common, single meta-narrative. The emergence of distinctive inter-denominational and inter- religious discourses is increasingly shaping a shared, pluralistic narrative grounded in social justice, care for creation and intergenerational solidarity. Moreover, religions and FBOs are already bringing an integral, holistic perspective to the socio-environmental debate, filling in an interstitial place in the sustainability arena, while performing four key functions: bridging, binding, deepening and sustaining. The medium and long-term impact of the recent interreligious discursive convergence in catalyzing action and bringing behavioral change on ecological matters still lacks, however, a robust, evidence-based analysis.

info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion

Artículos en revistas

Country
Spain
Related Organizations
Keywords

330, 300

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
Green