
handle: 11499/6559
Although there have been quite a number of theoretical and practical studies where axiomatic design (AD) principles have been used in the last few years, there is a lack of a comprehensive literature survey which evaluates and classifies these papers. This study provides a recognizable overview of literature on AD principles from the past 20 years and introduces a novel classification scheme covering 63 papers. Each article was classified into four main groups, namely the type of the axiom, the application area, the method, and the evaluation type. Findings of our paper indicate that most of the studies in the literature are application-based papers which use typically the independence axiom. While product design is put forward in the application area, the crisp approach is widely used as an evaluation type. A rise in the fuzzy evaluation based research studies using the information axiom for multi-attribute decision making problems has also been noticed. © 2010 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
Axiomatic design, Paper, Independence axiom, Literature reviews, 330, Information axiom, Axiomatic design; Independence axiom; Information axiom, Product design, Classification scheme, Literature survey, Research studies, Multi attribute decision making, Decision making
Axiomatic design, Paper, Independence axiom, Literature reviews, 330, Information axiom, Axiomatic design; Independence axiom; Information axiom, Product design, Classification scheme, Literature survey, Research studies, Multi attribute decision making, Decision making
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
