Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ Pamukkale GCRIS Data...arrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
versions View all 1 versions
addClaim

Dini tutum ve eş seçimi ilişkisi

The relationship between religious attitude and spouse selection
Authors: Yılmaz, Mürşit;

Dini tutum ve eş seçimi ilişkisi

Abstract

The aim of this study is to examine the relationship between choosing a spouse and religious attitude. In addition to the relationship between choosing a spouse and religious attitude, the study also examined the differentiation according to independent variables such as gender, socio-economic status, age, educational status, city of residence, political opinion and self-perceived level of religiosity. The study was designed according to the correlational survey model, one of the quantitative research methods. The data collection tools of the study were the Priorities in Choosing a Spouse Measurement Tool and the Religious Attitude Scale. The study group consisted of a total of 623 people, 318 of whom were female (51%) and 305 of whom were male (49%). The data obtained in the study were analyzed using the Statistical Program for the Social Sciences- SPSS 26.0 statistical program. According to the findings, there is a statistically significant positive relationship between choosing a spouse and religiosity. Some of the confirmed sub-hypotheses are as follows: The level of criteria for choosing a spouse differs according to gender, age, education level, perception of religiosity, and political opinion. Unconfirmed subhypotheses: The level of criteria for choosing a spouse differs according to place of residence and socioeconomic status. The level of religiosity differs according to educational status and socioeconomic status.

Bu çalışmanın amacı eş seçme kriterleri ve dini tutum arasındaki ilişkiyi incelemektir. Çalışmada eş seçme ve dini tutum ilişkisinin yanı sıra cinsiyet, sosyo-ekonomik durum, yaş, eğitim durumu, yaşadığı şehir, politik-siyasi görüş ve kendini algıladığı dindarlık düzeyi gibi bağımsız değişkenlere göre farklılaşması da incelenmiştir. Çalışma nicel araştırma yöntemlerinden ilişkisel (korelasyonel) tarama modeline göre tasarlanmıştır. Çalışmanın veri toplama araçları olarak Eş Seçmede Öncelikler Ölçme Aracı ve Dini Tutum Ölçeği kullanılmıştır. Çalışma grubu ise 318’i kadın (%51), 305’i erkek (%49) olmak üzere toplam 623 kişiden oluşmaktadır. Çalışmada elde edilen veriler Statistical Program for the Social Sciences- SPSS 26.0 istatistik programı kullanılarak analiz edilmiştir. Elde edilen bulgulara göre eş seçme ile dindarlık arasında istatiksel olarak anlamlı pozitif yönlü bir ilişki tespit edilmiştir. Alt hipotezimizden doğrulananlardan bazıları şunlardır: Cinsiyete göre, yaşa göre, eğitim durumuna göre, dindarlık algısına göre, politik siyasi görüşe göre eş seçme kriterleri düzeyi farklılaşmaktadır. Doğrulanmayan alt hipotezlerimiz: Yaşanılan yere göre, sosyoekonomik duruma göre eş seçme kriterleri düzeyi farklılaşmaktadır. Eğitim durumuna ve sosyo-ekonomik duruma göre dindarlık düzeyi farklılaşmaktadır.

Country
Turkey
Related Organizations
Keywords

330, Religiosity, Dini Tutum, Spouse Selection, Eş Seçimi, Evlilik, Sociology of Religion, Dindarlık, Religious Attitude, Marriage, Din Sosyolojisi

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
Green