Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ Dicle Üniversitesi K...arrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

Vernal keratokonjonktivitli olgularda ortalama trombosit hacmi ve nötrofil/lenfosit oranı

Authors: ELBEY, Bilal; YAZGAN, Ümit; YILDIRIM, Adnan; KARAALP, Ümit; ŞAHİN, Alparslan;

Vernal keratokonjonktivitli olgularda ortalama trombosit hacmi ve nötrofil/lenfosit oranı

Abstract

Objective: It was aimed to investigate the neutrophil, eosinophil, lymphocyte, platelet count, neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio (NLR) and mean platelet volume (MPV) in patients with vernal keratoconjunctivitis (VKC).Methods: The medical records of the VKC patients who admitted to ophthalmology polyclinic were evaluated. Age and sex matched control group was consisted with patients without any systemic or ocular disease except strabismus. Age and gender of all participants were recorded. Hemogram parameters such as mean platelet volume (MPV), neutrophil, eosinophil, lymphocyte, platelet count, NLR were measured by automatized analyzer. Data were compared between the groups.Results: Thirty patients and 30 control subjects were studied. There were no significant differences with respect to age and gender between groups. The mean MPV and NLR values were higher but not statistically significant in VKC group compared to control group (p=0.19, p=0.16, respectively). Conclusion: The results of the current study demonstrated that MPV and NLR values were not associated with VKC. Higher MPV and NLR results in patients with VKC although the differences were not reach statistically significances may suggest that MPV and NLR may be auxiliary parameter. J Clin Exp Invest 2015; 6 (1): 40-43.

Amaç: Bu çalışmada vernal keratokonjonktiviti (VKK) olan hastaların nötrofil, eozinofil, lenfosit, trombosit sayısı, nötrofil/lenfosit oranı (NLO), ortalama trombosit hacmi (MPV) değerlendirilmesi amaçlanmıştır.Yöntemler: Bu çalışmada göz hastalıkları polikliniğine başvurmuş ve VKK tanısı almış olguların dosya kayıtları retrospektif olarak incelendi. Şaşılık dışında herhangi bir sistemik ve oküler hastalığı bulunmayan yaş ve cinsiyet uyumlu olgular kontrol grubuna dahil edildi. Tüm katılımcıların yaş ve cinsiyet verileri kaydedildi. Hemogram değerlerinden; MPV nötrofil, eozinofil, lenfosit, trombosit sayımı, NLO otomatik analizörlerle ölçüldü. Elde edilen veriler iki grup arasında karşılaştırıldı.Bulgular: Çalışma kapsamında 30 VKK ve 30 kontrol olgusu değerlendirildi. Gruplar arasında yaş ve cinsiyet açısından anlamlı farklılık saptanmadı. MPV ve NLO, VKK grubunda kontrol grubuna oranla daha yüksek olmasına rağmen istatistiksel olarak anlamlı değildi (sırasıyla p=0,19 ve p=0,16).Sonuç: Bu çalışmanın sonucunda MPV ve NLO değerlerinin VKK hastalığıyla ilişkili olmadığını gösterilmiştir. MPV ve NLO değerlerinin VKK'da istatistiksel olarak anlamlı olmamalarına rağmen daha yüksek olması VKK için yardımcı parametre olarak kullanılabilir.

Country
Turkey
Related Organizations
Keywords

Nötrofil lenfosit oranı;ortalama trombosit hacmi;vernal keratokonjonktivit, Neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio;mean platelet volume;vernal keratoconjunctivitis, Mean platelet volume, Neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio, Nötrofil lenfosit oranı, Vernal keratoconjunctivitis, Ortalama trombosit hacmi, Vernal keratokonjonktivit

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
Green