
In literature, there are various methods regarding personnel selection. However, it is observed that in these methods, the interdependency of per sonnel selection factors are not taken into consideration. In this paper, a method including interdependencies of the personnel selection factors is studied for the purpose of satisfying the defect noticed. Firstly, the factors eligible to be accepted as criteria in personnel selection are determined, and a decision-making model demonstrating the dependency between these factors is developed. Global weights of the factors in the model are estimated by means of Analytic Network Process (ANP). Secondly, an evaluation scale as to the assessment of personnel selection factors is formed. Lastly, the way the adequacies of applicants can be measured is depicted with an example.
Analytic Network Process, Analitik Ağ Süreci, Multiple Criteria Analysis, Analitik Hiyerarşi Süreci, Personel Seçimi;Çok Kriterli Analiz;Analitik Ağ Süreci;Analitik Hiyerarşi Süreci, Personel Seçimi, Çok Kriterli Analiz, Personnel Selection, Analytic Hierarchy Process
Analytic Network Process, Analitik Ağ Süreci, Multiple Criteria Analysis, Analitik Hiyerarşi Süreci, Personel Seçimi;Çok Kriterli Analiz;Analitik Ağ Süreci;Analitik Hiyerarşi Süreci, Personel Seçimi, Çok Kriterli Analiz, Personnel Selection, Analytic Hierarchy Process
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
