Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ Repositorio Universi...arrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
versions View all 1 versions
addClaim

Niveles de abonamiento orgánico en el cultivo de lechuga (lactuca sativa L.), variedad great lakes, en suelos ultisoles de la Banda de Shilcayo-San Martín-Perú

Authors: Garcia Flores, Wilter;

Niveles de abonamiento orgánico en el cultivo de lechuga (lactuca sativa L.), variedad great lakes, en suelos ultisoles de la Banda de Shilcayo-San Martín-Perú

Abstract

El presente trabajo se desarrolló en el Fundo Miraflores en el año 2 006, Sector Ahuashiyacu distrito de la Banda de Shilcayo, provincia de San Martín y Región San Martín, en un suelo con características que a continuación se describe: textura, Franco arenoso; pH, 5, 7; fósforo disponible 7,0 ppm; potasio cambiable, O, 19 meq. /100 g de suelo. El objetivo de este trabajo fue evaluar la aplicación de diferentes dosificaciones de Humus, buscando cual de éstas, es la dosis óptima para el rendimiento de la lechuga (var.: Great Lake). Se evaluaron diferente parámetros como: Altura de plantas, número de hojas, tamaño de raíces, producción y longitud de hojas tanto el largo como el ancho. El diseño empleado fue el de Bloques Completos Randomizados con 5 tratamientos y 4 repeticiones, las dosificaciones fueron las siguientes: TO (Testigo Absoluto), T1 (HUMUS = 1,25 Kg./1 m2 ), T2 (HUMUS = 1,37 Kg./1 m2 ) , T3 (HUMUS = 1,50 Kg./1 m2 ) y T4 (HUMUS = 1,68 Kg./1 m2 ), el distanciamiento de siembra fue de 0,25 entre filas y 0,35 entre plantas. Los resultados determinan que el T2 (HUMUS = 1,37 Kg. /1 m2 ) fue el mas sobresaliente en el rendimiento, al igual que en la relación costo/beneficio, con 17 497,50 Kg./Ha y el 20,81% (C/B) respectivamente., frente al TO (Testigo) con 10350,00 Kg./Ha (rendimiento) y 32,49% (C/B) .

The present work was developed in the Found Miraflores in the year 2 006, Sector Ahuashiyacu district of the Band of Shilcayo, county of San Martín and Region San Martín, in a floor with characteristics that next is described: texture, sandy Franco; pH, 5,7; match available 7,0 ppm; changeable potassium, O, 19 meq. /100 g of floor. The objective of this work was to evaluate the application of different dosages of Humus, looking for which of these, it is the good dose for the yield of the lettuce (var.: Great Lake). Different parameters were evaluated like: Height of plants, number of leaves, size of roots, production and longitude of leaves as much the long one as the width. The used design was that of Complete Blocks Randomizados with 5 treatments and 4 repetitions, the dosages were the following ones: TO (Absolute Witness), T1 (HUMUS = 1,25 Kg. /1 m2), T2 (HUMUS = 1,37 Kg. /1 m2), T3 (HUMUS = 1,50 Kg. /1 m2) and T 4 (HUMUS = 1,68 Kg. /1 m2), the distancing was of 0,25 between lines and 0,35 among plants. The results determine that the T2 (HUMUS = 1,37 Kg. /1 m2) it was the but excellent in the yield, the same as in the relationship cost/benefit, with 17 497,50 Kg. I there is and 20,81 o/o (C/B) respectively, in front of the TO (Witness) with 10350,00 Kg. I there is (yield) and 32,49% (C/B).

Country
Peru
Related Organizations
Keywords

Orgánico, Lechuga, Sativa, Niveles, 630, Abonamiento, https://purl.org/pe-repo/ocde/ford#4.01.06, Lactuca

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
Green