
El presente trabajo se desarrolló en el Fundo Miraflores en el año 2 006, Sector Ahuashiyacu distrito de la Banda de Shilcayo, provincia de San Martín y Región San Martín, en un suelo con características que a continuación se describe: textura, Franco arenoso; pH, 5, 7; fósforo disponible 7,0 ppm; potasio cambiable, O, 19 meq. /100 g de suelo. El objetivo de este trabajo fue evaluar la aplicación de diferentes dosificaciones de Humus, buscando cual de éstas, es la dosis óptima para el rendimiento de la lechuga (var.: Great Lake). Se evaluaron diferente parámetros como: Altura de plantas, número de hojas, tamaño de raíces, producción y longitud de hojas tanto el largo como el ancho. El diseño empleado fue el de Bloques Completos Randomizados con 5 tratamientos y 4 repeticiones, las dosificaciones fueron las siguientes: TO (Testigo Absoluto), T1 (HUMUS = 1,25 Kg./1 m2 ), T2 (HUMUS = 1,37 Kg./1 m2 ) , T3 (HUMUS = 1,50 Kg./1 m2 ) y T4 (HUMUS = 1,68 Kg./1 m2 ), el distanciamiento de siembra fue de 0,25 entre filas y 0,35 entre plantas. Los resultados determinan que el T2 (HUMUS = 1,37 Kg. /1 m2 ) fue el mas sobresaliente en el rendimiento, al igual que en la relación costo/beneficio, con 17 497,50 Kg./Ha y el 20,81% (C/B) respectivamente., frente al TO (Testigo) con 10350,00 Kg./Ha (rendimiento) y 32,49% (C/B) .
The present work was developed in the Found Miraflores in the year 2 006, Sector Ahuashiyacu district of the Band of Shilcayo, county of San Martín and Region San Martín, in a floor with characteristics that next is described: texture, sandy Franco; pH, 5,7; match available 7,0 ppm; changeable potassium, O, 19 meq. /100 g of floor. The objective of this work was to evaluate the application of different dosages of Humus, looking for which of these, it is the good dose for the yield of the lettuce (var.: Great Lake). Different parameters were evaluated like: Height of plants, number of leaves, size of roots, production and longitude of leaves as much the long one as the width. The used design was that of Complete Blocks Randomizados with 5 treatments and 4 repetitions, the dosages were the following ones: TO (Absolute Witness), T1 (HUMUS = 1,25 Kg. /1 m2), T2 (HUMUS = 1,37 Kg. /1 m2), T3 (HUMUS = 1,50 Kg. /1 m2) and T 4 (HUMUS = 1,68 Kg. /1 m2), the distancing was of 0,25 between lines and 0,35 among plants. The results determine that the T2 (HUMUS = 1,37 Kg. /1 m2) it was the but excellent in the yield, the same as in the relationship cost/benefit, with 17 497,50 Kg. I there is and 20,81 o/o (C/B) respectively, in front of the TO (Witness) with 10350,00 Kg. I there is (yield) and 32,49% (C/B).
Orgánico, Lechuga, Sativa, Niveles, 630, Abonamiento, https://purl.org/pe-repo/ocde/ford#4.01.06, Lactuca
Orgánico, Lechuga, Sativa, Niveles, 630, Abonamiento, https://purl.org/pe-repo/ocde/ford#4.01.06, Lactuca
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
