Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Ege University Insti...arrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao
addClaim

Response of Cucumber to Deficit Irrigation

Authors: Tuzel, I. H.; Tuzel, Y.; Meric, M. K.; Whalley, R.; Lock, G.;

Response of Cucumber to Deficit Irrigation

Abstract

An experiment was conducted in a polyethylene greenhouse at farmers' condition with the objectives of i) determining cucumber response to water stress, ii) quantification of water use in different deficit irrigation programs, iii) defining practical recommendations for water management and iv) assess the crop response factor (ky) and water use of efficiency (WUE) under local conditions. The experiment was designed in three randomized blocks. Each block had four different treatments: (1) Full irrigation, soil water content was allowed to be depleted to 20% of available water content of the plant root zone, (2) Deficit 1, soil water content was allowed to be depleted to 40% of available water content of the plant root zone, (3) Deficit 2, soil water content was allowed to be depleted to 60% of available water content of the plant root zone and (4) Farmer's treatment-control, done according to farmers visual observations. A controller (GP1) was installed in each irrigation treatment in one block and the soil moisture, temperature and salinity were monitored with WET sensor and water-filled-tensiometers were installed at a 20 cm depth and SM200 moisture sensor installed at 40 cm depth. All irrigation and fertilization was undertaken with drip irrigation system. For each treatment, representative plants were grown in containers in order to measure the drained water. The highest yield was obtained from the full irrigation treatment (27.8 kg m(-2)) whereas it was lowest in Deficit 1 (20.3 kg m(-2)). Water consumption of treatments ranked between 387 to 591 mm. WUE values were the smallest in Farmer's treatment and were the greatest in Deficit treatments. Yield response factors varied from 0.66-1.22.

Country
Turkey
Related Organizations
Keywords

water use efficiency, greenhouse, evapotranspiration, plant response factor

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!