Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ LAReferencia - Red F...arrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
versions View all 1 versions
addClaim

Avaliação da dureza superficial de resinas compostas para dentes posteriors

Authors: Baptista Oertli, Daniela Cahú; Vidal Mesquita, Renata; Machado Salete, Candido Maria; Uchoa, Roseanne; Bráz, Rodivan;

Avaliação da dureza superficial de resinas compostas para dentes posteriors

Abstract

The aim of this work in vitro was to evaluate the superficial hardness of four resin based composites used for restoration of posterior teeth (Point4/Kerr, Z250/3M Espe, Z100/3M Espe and P60/ 3M Espe). Vickers hardness was obtained using a digital microdurometer (Bueler Micromet 2003), which applied 200 gf (1,96 N) load for 15 seconds. Vickers hardness mean values were: Point 4 (53,7); Z100 (104,7); Z250 (86,9) e P60 (86,1). ANOVA indicated significant difference between these results. Tukey's comparison test showed that Z250 and P60 where not different from each other, although they where different from all the other composites. Therefore, it can be concluded that Z100 had the greatest hardness followed by Z250 and P60 (with the same performance) and Point 4 had the lowest Vickers hardness.

Country
Brazil
Keywords

Posterior teeth, Hardness, Resin composite

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
Green