Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ LAReferencia - Red F...arrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
versions View all 1 versions
addClaim

Literatura, cinema e outras arquiteturas textuais: algumas considerações sobre teorias da adaptação

Authors: Hattnher, Alvaro Luiz;

Literatura, cinema e outras arquiteturas textuais: algumas considerações sobre teorias da adaptação

Abstract

Os estudos que investigam as possíveis relações entre literatura e cinema têm se orientado, em grande parte, por um vetor de análise cujo sentido é sempre o do texto literário na direção do texto fílmico. Além disso, a grande maioria das análises feitas por teóricos renomados como Robert Stam e Brian McFarlane aborda tão exclusivamente textos literários que se poderiam chamar de canônicos. Isso revela uma ênfase excessiva na noção de que o texto “primordial” em um estudo de adaptação deva ser o texto literário. Este ensaio pretende discutir algumas dessas concepções, contestando os modelos “binários” de estudos de adaptação e mostrando de que maneira os vetores de análise podem ser proveitosamente invertidos, por exemplo, partindo-se do cinema para a literatura e outras arquiteturas textuais. Essa orientação, partilhada por teóricos como Linda Hutcheon (2006) e Thomas Leitch (2007), rejeita antigas noções que pautavam as comparações entre obras literárias e fílmicas, tais como fidelidade e equivalência, substituindo-as por intertextualidade e transmidialidade

Studies investigating the relationship between literature and film have been largely oriented by an analysis vector which always departs from literary texts towards films. Moreover, the overwhelming majority of criticism done by renowned theorists such as Robert Stam and Brian McFarlane approaches almost exclusively texts considered canonical. This reveals an overemphasis on the notion that the “primordial” text in a study of adaptation should be the literary text. This essay discusses some of those concepts, challenging the “binary” models in adaptation studies and showing how the vectors of analysis can be usefully reversed, for example, starting from films to literature and to other textual architectures. This approach, shared by theorists such as Linda Hutcheon (2006) and Thomas Leitch (2007), rejects old notions that guided comparisons between literary and filmic texts, such as fidelity and equivalence, replacing them with intertextuality and transmedia storytelling.

Country
Brazil
Keywords

Intertextualidade, Narrativa Transmidiática, Fidelidade, Transmedia Storytelling, Fidelity, Adaptation, Intertextuality, Adaptação

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
Green