Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ LAReferencia - Red F...arrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
versions View all 1 versions
addClaim

Efeito do controle de placa bacteriana supragengival sobre parâmetros subgengivais

Authors: Gomes, Sabrina Carvalho;

Efeito do controle de placa bacteriana supragengival sobre parâmetros subgengivais

Abstract

The present study aimed to investigate the effect of a supragingival plaque control regiment and to compare this effect between never smokers (NS) and smokers (S) periodontitis patients. During the 6 months experimental period 50 patients, 25 in each group, were clinically examined by a singular calibrated examiner in the baseline (I), 30, 90 and 180 days (F). 45 individuals contributed with GCF and microbiological sampling. Mean values of the percentage of sites VPI+, MBI+, BOP, the PPD and CAL measurements (mm), GCF volume (æl) and number of the Eubacteria (Eu); Porphyromonas gingivalis (Pg), Peptostreptococcus micros (Pm), Dialister pneumosintes (Dp), Actinobacillus actinomycetemcomitans (Aa), were calculated for the individual to compose the groups means. Data from baseline and final examinations were compared (test Wald p=0.05). It could be observed that a supragingival plaque control significantly contributed to VPI NSI: 91.1 and F: 8.7; S- I: 88.5 e F: 6.4), MBI (NS- I: 83.8 e F: 2.2; S- I: 76.1 e F: 0.3), BOP (NS- I: 95.0 e F: 21.6; S- I: 94.4 e F: 25.3), PPD (NS- I: 3.7 e F: 2.6; SI: 3.9 e F: 2.8); CAL (NS- I: 3.4 e 3.0; S- I: 4.3 e F: 3.7), GCF (NS- I: 0.59e F: 0.23; S- I: 0.36 e F: 0.16) and number of Tb (NS- I: 1.09x105; F: 2.3x101; S- I: 1.9x105; F: 1.9x101); Pg (NS- I: 1.07x103; F: 7.0x101; S- I: 1.4x103; F: 9.4x101); Pm (NS- I: 2.1x105; F: 0.3x105; S- I: 6.8x105; F: 0.5x105); Aa (NS- I: 2.5x101; F: 1.0x101; S- I: 1.7x101; F: 0.76x101) and Dp (NS- I: 3.7x101; F: 0.72x101; S- I: 9.6x101; F: 0.83x101) reductions. At the end, smokers presented less marginal bleeding, CAL, GCF volume and lower numbers of Eubacteria then never smokers. It can be concluded that both never smokers and smokers periodontitis patients can benefit from a supragingival plaque control regimen, even though 30 smokers presented less marginal bleeding and less number of Eubacteria at the end.

No presente estudo foi avaliado o efeito do controle de placa bacteriana supragengival sobre parâmetros clínicos e microbiológicos subgengivais, comparando-o em pacientes nunca fumantes (NFU) e fumantes (F). Durante esse ensaio clínico (6 meses), 25 pacientes, de cada grupo, foram examinados clinicamente, por um examinador calibrado, no momento inicial (I) e aos 30, 90 e 180 (exame final F) dias. 45 desses indivíduos contribuíram com amostras para cálculo do volume de fluido e avaliação microbiológica. As médias do percentual de sítios com IPV, ISG e SS e as médias da PS e PI (em milímetros), do volume de fluido (æl) e as médias do número de bactérias totais (Eubactéria, Eu), Porphyromonas gingivalis (Pg), Peptostreptococcus micros (Pm), Dialister pneumosintes (Dp), Actinobacillus actinomycetemcomitans (Aa) foram geradas para o indivíduo e, posteriormente, para os grupos. Dados do exame inicial e final foram comparados (teste Wald, p=0.05). Foi observado que o efeito do controle de placa bacteriano supragengival contribuiu para a redução significante de IPV (NFU- I: 91,1 e F: 8,7; FU- I: 88,5 e F: 6,4), ISG (NFU- I: 83,8 e F: 2,2; FU- I: 76,1 e F: 0,3), SS (NFU- I: 95,0 e F: 21,6; FU- I: 94,4 e F: 25,3), PS (NFU- I: 3,7 e F: 2,6; FU- I: 3,9 e F: 2,8), PI (NFU- I: 3,4 e 3.0; FU- I: 4., e F: 3,7), volume de fluido (NFU- I: 0,59 e F: 0,23; FU- I: 036 e F- 0,16) e número de Eubactérias (NFU- I: 1,09x105; F: 2,3x101; FU- I: 1,9x105; F: 1,9x101); Pg (NFU- I: 1,07x103; F: 7,0x101; FU- I: 1,4x103; F: 9,4x101); Pm (NFU- I: 2,1x105; F: 0,3x105; FU- I: 6,8x105; F: 0,5x105); Aa (NFU- I: 2,5x101; F: 1,0x101; FU- I: 1,7x101; F: 0,76x101) e Dp (NFU- I: 3,7x101; F: 0,72x101; FU- I: 9,6x101; F: 0,83x101). Ao final do estudo, pacientes fumantes apresentaram menor ISG e volume de fluido, maior PI e menor número de baterias totais....

Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (CNPq)

Pós-graduação em Odontologia - FOAR

Country
Brazil
Keywords

Tabagismo, Boca - Cuidado e higiene, Placa dentária, Oral hygiene, Microbiota, Reação de polimerase em cadeia, Tobacco, Microbiologia

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
Green
Related to Research communities