
handle: 11441/85621
No existe consenso sobre la idoneidad de la implementación de los modelos de credit scoring para evaluar la solvencia del solicitante de un microcrédito. En este trabajo, se propone una metodología que permite decidir, a priori, en función del enfoque estratégico que tenga una Institución Microfi nanciera (IMF), si le sería útil o no dicha implementación. Para llevar a cabo la discriminación anterior, se ha diseñado una matriz que clasifi ca a las IMFs, según sus orientaciones estratégicas, en potenciales implantadoras de sistemas de credit scoring, o bien, en IMFs que no necesitan tales herramientas. Para realizar la investigación, hemos utilizado la metodología del caso, analizando tres IMFs españolas con perfi les diferentes a través de un cuestionario, recabando datos cuantitativos y cualitativos, al objeto de buscar evidencia empírica que corrobore el análisis teórico realizado.
No consensus exists about the suitability of the implementation of credit scoring models for the assessment of the creditworthiness of a microcredit applicant. In this paper, a methodology is proposed in order to fi rst determine, depending on the strategic focus of the MFIs, whether this implementation would be useful. For this discrimination, a matrix is designed which classifi es the MFIs, according to their strategy, as potential or non-potential users of a credit-scoring system. To this end, a case-study methodology is employed which analyses three MFIs of widely diff ering profi les by means of a both quantitative and qualitative survey whose aim is to seek empirical evidence which verifi es the theoretical analysis performed.
Autosuficiencia Financiera, Financial self-sufficiency, Acuerdos de Basilea, Instituciones Microfinancieras, Credit scoring, Microfinancial Institutions, Basel Accords
Autosuficiencia Financiera, Financial self-sufficiency, Acuerdos de Basilea, Instituciones Microfinancieras, Credit scoring, Microfinancial Institutions, Basel Accords
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
