Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
addClaim

[Coloanal pouch in surgery of rectal neoplasms].

Authors: N F, Jespersen; P, Hesselfeldt; S, Bülow;

[Coloanal pouch in surgery of rectal neoplasms].

Abstract

The aim of this study was to evaluate the rate of complications and the functional result after construction of a coloanal J pouch during low anterior resection of the rectum for cancer.A retrospective study of medical records and interviews with patients at follow-up.32 patients were followed-up for a median of 28 months (range 12-82 months). Two patients (6%) developed anastomotic leakage, one of whom died. Two patients developed rectovaginal fistula, one of whom was given a permanent colostomy. One patient died from complications after closure of the diverting ileostomy. In two patients, local cancer recurred and four died from distant metastases. At follow-up, the frequency of bowel movements was median 2/24 h (range 0.3-4). Three of 29 (10%) experienced intermittent incontinence, whereas none complained of evacuation problems.The complication rate was as expected after low anterior rectal resection, but there were unexpected severe complications after closure of the diverting stoma. The functional results were satisfactory and the construction of a colonic J pouch is recommended during low rectal resection, if the defecation pattern and the quality of life is to improve, especially within the first postoperative year.

Related Organizations
Keywords

Adenoma, Adult, Male, Rectal Neoplasms, Proctocolectomy, Restorative, Adenocarcinoma, Middle Aged, Prognosis, Postoperative Complications, Treatment Outcome, Humans, Female, Fecal Incontinence, Aged, Follow-Up Studies, Retrospective Studies

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
Related to Research communities
Cancer Research
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!