Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
addClaim

Dose intensity for breast cancer.

Authors: D K, Armstrong; N E, Davidson;

Dose intensity for breast cancer.

Abstract

Despite nearly 20 years of study, the importance of chemotherapy dose intensity in breast cancer remains unclear. Substantial preclinical data suggest a dose-response relationship, and consistent data document that recipients of substandard dosing have inferior outcomes. The use of increased dose-intensive therapies is costly, may require the use of hematopoietic growth factor support, and can result in significant increases in both short- and long-term toxicities. In patients with metastatic disease, increased dose intensity frequently results in increased response rates. However, these increased responses have not translated into consistent improvements in time to progression or overall survival benefit. In the adjuvant setting, increases in the dose intensities of alkylating agents and anthracyclines have failed to support the concept of dose escalation beyond standard doses. Certain subgroups of patients, such as those whose tumors overexpress HER2/neu, may derive a benefit from more dose-intensive therapies. Early results of randomized trials of high-dose chemotherapy in the treatment of metastatic breast cancer and adjuvant therapy for high-risk, early-stage breast cancer, are provocative. However, the often conflicting data do not support the routine use of this modality outside of the study setting.

Keywords

Dose-Response Relationship, Drug, Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation, Humans, Antineoplastic Agents, Breast Neoplasms, Female, Combined Modality Therapy, Bone Marrow Transplantation

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    3
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
3
Average
Average
Average
Related to Research communities
Cancer Research
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!